Dallas dudes dodge decompression death
Author: mgiles | Category: Airlines, Incidents, Safety
Southwest 737 hull failure
Federal safety officials at Dallas are investigating how a foot-long hole opened in the top of the jet, forcing the emergency landing in Charleston, W. Va.
The Boeing 737 jet lost pressure in the cabin, but no one was injured on Monday’s Nashville-to-Baltimore flight that carried 126 passengers and five crew members.
The plane was built in 1994, and government records indicated that an inspection in January turned up eight cracks in the frame that required repairs.
Southwest said Tuesday that it inspected all 181 of its identical Boeing 737-300-series jets overnight before putting them back in the sky. Passenger Michael Cunningham told NBC’s “Today” show Tuesday that he had dozed off in his seat in mid-cabin when he was awakened by “the loudest roar I’d ever heard,” and saw the hole above his seat.
Cunningham said people stayed calm and put on oxygen masks that dropped from the ceiling. “After we landed in Charleston, the pilot came out and looked up through the hole, and everybody applauded, shook his hand, a couple of people gave him hugs,” he said.
Passengers in the front rows didn’t know the full extent of the hole — that it went right through to the sky, said Charles Overby, CEO of the Freedom Forum, a free-press foundation that runs the Newseum in Washington. “I was just as happy not to know that,” he told The Associated Press. “It was pretty harrowing, but I’ve been through worse landings during turbulence.”
Southwest said it was unclear what caused the hole, which ripped open just in front of the vertical tail fin as the plane cruised at 30,000 feet. The jet flew on for nearly half an hour to Charleston.
Federal Aviation Administration records show that during the plane’s 14-year checkup in January, eight cracks were found in the fuselage frame and repaired.
Damage from wear and tear is not unusual in planes of that age, and the FAA requires special inspections for cracks. In March, Southwest agreed to pay $7.5 million to settle charges that it operated planes that had missed those required inspections.
FAA spokesman Lynn Lunsford said an initial review indicated that inspection orders for the Boeing 737-300 didn’t include inspecting the area of the body where the tear appeared on Monday’s flight.
The FAA and the National Transportation Safety Board sent investigators to the scene to interview the crew and examine maintenance and inspection records, but could take months to find a cause, said agency spokesman Keith Holloway.
Southwest spokeswoman Marilee McInnis said workers conducted “a walk-around visual inspection” of the airline’s other 737-300s and discovered no cracks. During periodic maintenance overhauls, workers use equipment designed to detect cracks that aren’t visible.
The 137-seat 737-300 makes up about one-third of Southwest’s fleet. All its 544 jets are various models of the Boeing 737. Southwest operated a normal schedule of flights — about 3,300 per day — with no cancelations or delays through midday, McInnis said. Experts said the tear could have been caused by damage from a dent or ding, or the plane’s skin could have suffered from age-related fatigue. Jet cabins are pressurized and depressurized with every flight, which can cause tiny cracks over time. The Southwest jet was built in 1994.
Bill Voss, president of the Flight Safety Foundation in Alexandria, Va., said a finding of fatigue would be more frightening. If that were the cause, it could force the FAA to consider more rigorous inspections for older aircraft, he said.
Alten “Skip” Grandt, an aeronautics professor at Purdue University who specializes in structural analysis, said that the fuselage of the Boeing jet performed as designed by preventing a sudden and catastrophic loss of pressure, and stopping the hole from expanding.
The cabin depressurized, he said, “but whatever caused that hole, it didn’t cause the whole airplane to blow up.”
In 1988, cracks caused part of the roof of an Aloha Airlines Boeing 737 to peel open while the jet flew from Hilo to Honolulu. A flight attendant was blown out of the plane and plunged to her death, and dozens of passengers were injured. The incident led to tougher rules for inspecting fuselages.
In March, Southwest agreed to pay a $7.5 million civil penalty imposed by the Federal Aviation Administration for operating nearly 60,000 flights in 2007 on planes that had not undergone required inspections for cracks in the fuselage.
About 1,450 flights took place after the FAA had notified Southwest of the missed inspections.
Dallas-based Southwest Airlines Co. carries more than 100 million U.S. passengers a year, more than any other airline.
Original article at http://www.fox4kc.com/sns-ap-us-emergency-landing,0,2481185.story
July 17th, 2009 at 9:34 pm
Very nice site!
July 23rd, 2009 at 3:38 am
I can,t understand why all 737,s were not grounded
This could be a seriouse problem that puts all passengers in danger after all the americans had the concorde grounded for just one incident.
Its time they got down off their high horse, but if it,s not in their favour?????
July 24th, 2009 at 9:12 am
Hello David. Yes interesting how sometimes there is a rapid repsonse and at other time softly softly. Despite protestations I am sure the commercial reality comes into play more often than is admitted. That is why we blog and watch and that is one of the virtues of the internet.
Cheers
Michael
September 24th, 2009 at 9:24 am
haha
October 25th, 2009 at 12:15 pm
Just wondering if you have blogs on any other niche as i really like this blog?
October 30th, 2009 at 5:22 pm
This is a good post although the layout of the site is slightly off in Chrome and in IE6.
November 1st, 2009 at 10:48 am
Thanks. Looking into the Chrome and IE6 thing.
Cheers Michael
December 8th, 2009 at 6:04 pm
very informative article… I would like to use a piece of this on my blog, is that feasible?
December 13th, 2009 at 7:41 am
everybody please stop smoking now
December 19th, 2009 at 5:30 am
good one
December 19th, 2009 at 10:06 pm
Hey, thanks for your blog, helpful news…
January 3rd, 2010 at 5:53 pm
Sure
January 3rd, 2010 at 5:56 pm
Amen
January 7th, 2010 at 8:26 am
how to subscrie to rss here?
January 8th, 2010 at 4:12 pm
I just wanted to thank you very much for this indepth article. I have already bookmarked your site, when I have more free time I am going to have to do some further reading. Well back to my dreaming of Panama or back to the books – I wonder which one is going to win out.
January 10th, 2010 at 3:10 am
hey, just wanted to comment
January 13th, 2010 at 2:04 pm
g00d stuff
June 12th, 2011 at 8:22 pm
hello…
really good article. Ready to hear more next week,my blog http://www.blurty.com/users/talonmpgraham/ Many Thanks….
June 14th, 2011 at 4:04 am
hello…
really good article. Ready to hear more next week,my blog http://fredrichards.sosblogs.com Many Thanks….
June 16th, 2011 at 3:27 pm
really good article…
I have spent a bit of time going through your posts, more than I should have but I must say, its worth it! http://mandy071.buzz-echo.com/2011/04/22/become-well-known/ many Thanks….
June 20th, 2011 at 4:04 pm
hello…
Hello there thanks for the quality post! http://rose11.normblogs.com/ ,i’d a good read.appreciate your article,My problem continues to be resolved….
August 18th, 2011 at 5:39 am
really…
Fat women and girls always worried because of their ugly shaped bodies. http://dnmjhkiu.livejournal.com/ , but they can not wear these outwears…